<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chariots of Iron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chariotsofiron.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com</link>
	<description>A Podcast for Atheists, Skeptics and Secular Humanists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 79: Sex &amp; God: How Religion Distorts Sexuality with Dr. Darrel Ray by Hypersapien</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2012/01/658/comment-page-1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypersapien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=658#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I love your podcast, but do you guys think you could start putting a plain html link to the mp3 right in the blog post? It&#039;s always a major pain getting your show saved onto my phone. The link in the rss feed doesn&#039;t show up on Google Reader&#039;s mobile site for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your podcast, but do you guys think you could start putting a plain html link to the mp3 right in the blog post? It&#8217;s always a major pain getting your show saved onto my phone. The link in the rss feed doesn&#8217;t show up on Google Reader&#8217;s mobile site for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 79: Sex &amp; God: How Religion Distorts Sexuality with Dr. Darrel Ray by Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2012/01/658/comment-page-1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=658#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Ahh, I missed you guys. Glad to see you back. I haven&#039;t listened to the podcast yet, but I am looking forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I missed you guys. Glad to see you back. I haven&#8217;t listened to the podcast yet, but I am looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 76: Are Humanists Satanists? with Jennifer Hancock by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/10/644/comment-page-1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 04:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=644#comment-157</guid>
		<description>There was no long tirade on the Tamil Tigers. I brought them up because religious apologists often cite them as an example of a secular group that engages in suicide attacks. My point is that the Tamil Tigers are not secular individually, but are quite religious.

Anyway, the reason we didn&#039;t go into any further detail about them is because they had very little to do with the actual topic being discussed. In fact, the only reason I gave any information about them at all was because Eli wasn&#039;t familiar with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no long tirade on the Tamil Tigers. I brought them up because religious apologists often cite them as an example of a secular group that engages in suicide attacks. My point is that the Tamil Tigers are not secular individually, but are quite religious.</p>
<p>Anyway, the reason we didn&#8217;t go into any further detail about them is because they had very little to do with the actual topic being discussed. In fact, the only reason I gave any information about them at all was because Eli wasn&#8217;t familiar with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 76: Are Humanists Satanists? with Jennifer Hancock by skepoet</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/10/644/comment-page-1#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>skepoet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=644#comment-156</guid>
		<description>You know the long tirade on the Tamil Tigers actually shows you really don&#039;t know what is at stake.  The Tamils are not JUST a religious demarcation, but also an ethnic one.  ( http://www.cfr.org/terrorist-organizations/liberation-tigers-tamil-eelam-aka-tamil-tigers-sri-lanka-separatists/p9242#p2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know the long tirade on the Tamil Tigers actually shows you really don&#8217;t know what is at stake.  The Tamils are not JUST a religious demarcation, but also an ethnic one.  ( <a href="http://www.cfr.org/terrorist-organizations/liberation-tigers-tamil-eelam-aka-tamil-tigers-sri-lanka-separatists/p9242#p2" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfr.org/terrorist-organizations/liberation-tigers-tamil-eelam-aka-tamil-tigers-sri-lanka-separatists/p9242#p2</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 77: Ramblin&#8217; On by Pallida</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/10/646/comment-page-1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Pallida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=646#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Hey guys! I&#039;ve been listening to CoI for over a year now, and have listened to all the podcasts you have posted. I love everything you do, but the comment that finally made me post was &quot;it&#039;s be like finding a copy of Game of Thrones where Ned Stark doesn&#039;t die&quot;. It made me smile all day long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys! I&#8217;ve been listening to CoI for over a year now, and have listened to all the podcasts you have posted. I love everything you do, but the comment that finally made me post was &#8220;it&#8217;s be like finding a copy of Game of Thrones where Ned Stark doesn&#8217;t die&#8221;. It made me smile all day long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 76: Are Humanists Satanists? with Jennifer Hancock by Remingol</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/10/644/comment-page-1#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Remingol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=644#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Eli I believe you mispronounced the name of the shul at which Antonin Scalia spoke at.  You pronounced it Doo Kwezny  I believe the correct pronunciation is Doo Kane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eli I believe you mispronounced the name of the shul at which Antonin Scalia spoke at.  You pronounced it Doo Kwezny  I believe the correct pronunciation is Doo Kane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 75: End of Hiatus by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/09/641/comment-page-1#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=641#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what the problem may be, and since I&#039;m not using a smart phone on a data plan, I&#039;m unlikely to find out. The feed itself is produced by Wordpress. Do you have any issues seeing other Wordpress rss feeds on your phone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the problem may be, and since I&#8217;m not using a smart phone on a data plan, I&#8217;m unlikely to find out. The feed itself is produced by WordPress. Do you have any issues seeing other WordPress rss feeds on your phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 75: End of Hiatus by Hypersapien</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/09/641/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypersapien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=641#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t mean to reply to Justin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t mean to reply to Justin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 75: End of Hiatus by Hypersapien</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/09/641/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypersapien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=641#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Is there any particular reason that the link to the mp3 shows up in the rss feed when I look at it on my desktop, but the link isn&#039;t there when I look at the rss feed on my phone? I&#039;m looking at both of them through the Google Reader web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any particular reason that the link to the mp3 shows up in the rss feed when I look at it on my desktop, but the link isn&#8217;t there when I look at the rss feed on my phone? I&#8217;m looking at both of them through the Google Reader web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 75: End of Hiatus by Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/09/641/comment-page-1#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=641#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Yay! Welcome back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Welcome back :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 74: Nature of Existence Contest Winners by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=635#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing to us, Paul. You have an amazing story and it touched both of us to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing to us, Paul. You have an amazing story and it touched both of us to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 74: Nature of Existence Contest Winners by The Philanthropy of Bill Gates &#124; Gneu.org</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635/comment-page-1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>The Philanthropy of Bill Gates &#124; Gneu.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=635#comment-139</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635" rel="nofollow">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 74: Nature of Existence Contest Winners by The Philanthropy of Bill Gates &#171; Rationality for the Irrational</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635/comment-page-1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>The Philanthropy of Bill Gates &#171; Rationality for the Irrational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=635#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635" rel="nofollow">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 74: Nature of Existence Contest Winners by Everleigh Way</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635/comment-page-1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Everleigh Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=635#comment-131</guid>
		<description>The accusation against Harold Camping will be that he knowing defrauded people. And the way to prove that would be to show that he, himself, did not shed himself of all his possessions and assets. 

If he left a single dollar in his bank account, that shows doubt, and if he didn&#039;t share that doubt with his followers, it is clearly fraud. 

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The accusation against Harold Camping will be that he knowing defrauded people. And the way to prove that would be to show that he, himself, did not shed himself of all his possessions and assets. </p>
<p>If he left a single dollar in his bank account, that shows doubt, and if he didn&#8217;t share that doubt with his followers, it is clearly fraud. </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 74: Nature of Existence Contest Winners by paulesungnomo</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>paulesungnomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=635#comment-130</guid>
		<description>i can&#039;t believe that you read my email! i was on my way to work and i heard it. thanks for doing that, it really made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can&#8217;t believe that you read my email! i was on my way to work and i heard it. thanks for doing that, it really made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 74: Nature of Existence Contest Winners by JHGRedekop</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/06/635/comment-page-1#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>JHGRedekop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=635#comment-129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m only ~20 minutes into the episode, but a couple of quick comments before I start work:

- The rabbis condemning the dog to stoning thing was a hoax. The stray dog was actually just picked up by the local dog catcher: http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/jewish_techs/jerusalem_dog_stoning_hoax_went_viral

- I have to wonder how people like Rick Perry or Mayor Linda Thompson of Harrisburg, PA (who has called for prayers to resolve the city&#039;s debt) harmonize their professed belief in capitalism as the One True Economic Model with their belief that money can be wished into existence by the Old Man in the Sky. Well... I don&#039;t really wonder: they just don&#039;t harmonize those beliefs at all. But it&#039;s an interesting dissonance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m only ~20 minutes into the episode, but a couple of quick comments before I start work:</p>
<p>- The rabbis condemning the dog to stoning thing was a hoax. The stray dog was actually just picked up by the local dog catcher: <a href="http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/jewish_techs/jerusalem_dog_stoning_hoax_went_viral" rel="nofollow">http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/jewish_techs/jerusalem_dog_stoning_hoax_went_viral</a></p>
<p>- I have to wonder how people like Rick Perry or Mayor Linda Thompson of Harrisburg, PA (who has called for prayers to resolve the city&#8217;s debt) harmonize their professed belief in capitalism as the One True Economic Model with their belief that money can be wished into existence by the Old Man in the Sky. Well&#8230; I don&#8217;t really wonder: they just don&#8217;t harmonize those beliefs at all. But it&#8217;s an interesting dissonance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by multivoxmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>multivoxmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Price is a brilliant Biblical scholar, as well as Lovecraft scholar. I&#039;m glad you have him on the show. Haven&#039;t had time to listen yet, but I&#039;ll be getting to that as soon as possible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price is a brilliant Biblical scholar, as well as Lovecraft scholar. I&#8217;m glad you have him on the show. Haven&#8217;t had time to listen yet, but I&#8217;ll be getting to that as soon as possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 15:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Lol, can you email me with a detailed, step-by-step, description of what you&#039;re doing to produce these errors. I&#039;d like to fix it, but as of yet I can&#039;t replicate it. I think that&#039;s because I&#039;m not doing what you&#039;re doing.

Meanwhile, let&#039;s save this comment area for actual comments about this episode. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, can you email me with a detailed, step-by-step, description of what you&#8217;re doing to produce these errors. I&#8217;d like to fix it, but as of yet I can&#8217;t replicate it. I think that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m not doing what you&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, let&#8217;s save this comment area for actual comments about this episode. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by lol mahmood</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>lol mahmood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 09:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Hi Lamar,

I don&#039;t know. Have you changed something? 

On my phone, if I click on the link for your latest episode and then click on &#039;save link&#039; (which for every other podcast I listen to allows me to download the mp3 file) I get a file called 628.bin. When I download and open that I just get taken back to the podcast page.

If I try the same thing on my laptop/pc (and I&#039;ve tried this on a Macbook, Windows XP PC and Windows 7 laptop) I just get a page of code headed with the message: &quot;This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below&quot;.

I can download through iTunes, but I rarely use my iPod any more because the headphone socket is knackered, so the only other option is to listen from my laptop. And, anyway; I hate iTunes! 

I used to download your shows on the move and listen to them on my travels, but I&#039;ve not been able to do that for ages.

Cheers,

Lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lamar,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. Have you changed something? </p>
<p>On my phone, if I click on the link for your latest episode and then click on &#8216;save link&#8217; (which for every other podcast I listen to allows me to download the mp3 file) I get a file called 628.bin. When I download and open that I just get taken back to the podcast page.</p>
<p>If I try the same thing on my laptop/pc (and I&#8217;ve tried this on a Macbook, Windows XP PC and Windows 7 laptop) I just get a page of code headed with the message: &#8220;This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can download through iTunes, but I rarely use my iPod any more because the headphone socket is knackered, so the only other option is to listen from my laptop. And, anyway; I hate iTunes! </p>
<p>I used to download your shows on the move and listen to them on my travels, but I&#8217;ve not been able to do that for ages.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 18:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Everything is working ok for me. What would we need to do to reproduce the errors you are getting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything is working ok for me. What would we need to do to reproduce the errors you are getting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by lol mahmood</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>lol mahmood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 09:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Hi Charioteers,

I don&#039;t know what you&#039;ve done to your site, but I haven&#039;t been able to download any of your mp3 files for at least a year, possibly longer. I usually download podcasts direct to my phone, and that can be a bit flaky sometimes, but I can&#039;t even download Chariots to my PC or laptop any more. 

When I try on the phone I get some kind of html file; if I try to subscribe to an mp3 RSS on the PC I get an error message (This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below) and a page of code. Only way I CAN download you is to log in to iTunes on my laptop, and not only do I hate iTunes, but I&#039;m very often out and about and can&#039;t access it.   

What gives?  I used to love Chariots, but I haven&#039;t been able to listen to it since last year! 

Cheers,

Lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charioteers,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve done to your site, but I haven&#8217;t been able to download any of your mp3 files for at least a year, possibly longer. I usually download podcasts direct to my phone, and that can be a bit flaky sometimes, but I can&#8217;t even download Chariots to my PC or laptop any more. </p>
<p>When I try on the phone I get some kind of html file; if I try to subscribe to an mp3 RSS on the PC I get an error message (This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below) and a page of code. Only way I CAN download you is to log in to iTunes on my laptop, and not only do I hate iTunes, but I&#8217;m very often out and about and can&#8217;t access it.   </p>
<p>What gives?  I used to love Chariots, but I haven&#8217;t been able to listen to it since last year! </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by Akira MacKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Akira MacKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 21:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-121</guid>
		<description>After having some time to calm down and reconsider my thoughts, I have to apologize for making an ass out of myself by flying off the handle in my previous post. It&#039;s clear that I overreacted,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having some time to calm down and reconsider my thoughts, I have to apologize for making an ass out of myself by flying off the handle in my previous post. It&#8217;s clear that I overreacted,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 05:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-120</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We atheists don’t need conformist, fascist bullshit like “community,” “family,” or “people.” We don’t need sentimentalist garbage like “ritual” or “tradition” to coddle the planet’s dullards. What we need is embrace the truth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You sound like a complete wingnut. If you actually have a point you have failed to make it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We atheists don’t need conformist, fascist bullshit like “community,” “family,” or “people.” We don’t need sentimentalist garbage like “ritual” or “tradition” to coddle the planet’s dullards. What we need is embrace the truth.</p></blockquote>
<p>You sound like a complete wingnut. If you actually have a point you have failed to make it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 72: Secular Christianity with Dr. Robert M. Price by Akira MacKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/05/628/comment-page-1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Akira MacKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 05:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=628#comment-119</guid>
		<description>As if your previous epsiode&#039;s fawning conversation regarding &quot;Secular Christianity&quot; weren&#039;t sickening enough, you had to compound the disgust by inviting Robert M. &quot;I need my security blankie&quot; Price to expound on how it&#039;s OK for atheists to wrap themselves in religious trappings to make themselves and the religionist scum around them feel secure. Despite being merely a dictionary atheist who doubts the existence of Christ, Price still clings to his Christian Right Preacher origins with his opposition to abortion rights and his cheerleading for the Rethuglican capitalist pigs who would ramrod Christianity down our throats. Having heard his bullshit before on &quot;The Reason Driven Podcast&quot; and &quot;The Bible Geek&quot; I deleted your latest episode from my iTunes directory. I don&#039;t need to hear his crap again.

The very notion of a &quot;Secular Christian&quot; (or &quot;Secular Jew,&quot; or &quot;Secular Muslim,&quot; etc.) should be spurned as the oxymoron that it is. I have no respect for the cowards who think that we must ape the very institutions that repress them just so they can can feel like they belong with the rest of the sheeple. We atheists don&#039;t need conformist, fascist bullshit like &quot;community,&quot; &quot;family,&quot; or &quot;people.&quot; We don&#039;t need sentimentalist garbage like &quot;ritual&quot; or &quot;tradition&quot; to coddle the planet&#039;s dullards. What we need is embrace the truth.

That truth is this: There are no deities. There is no afterlife or cosmic justice to be doled out to the &quot;just&quot; and &quot;unjust.&quot; Reality operates on materialistic, scientifically-demonstrable processes, not the primitive superstition of the &quot;supernatural.&quot;  &quot;Good&quot; and &quot;evil&quot; are merely biologically and socially created myths to keep the cowed human herds from destroying themselves. Our lives, the universe, and everything ultimately has no purpose or meaning. 

To those who can&#039;t handle these facts without sugar coating them in ceremonies and songs, I have this to say: TOUGH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if your previous epsiode&#8217;s fawning conversation regarding &#8220;Secular Christianity&#8221; weren&#8217;t sickening enough, you had to compound the disgust by inviting Robert M. &#8220;I need my security blankie&#8221; Price to expound on how it&#8217;s OK for atheists to wrap themselves in religious trappings to make themselves and the religionist scum around them feel secure. Despite being merely a dictionary atheist who doubts the existence of Christ, Price still clings to his Christian Right Preacher origins with his opposition to abortion rights and his cheerleading for the Rethuglican capitalist pigs who would ramrod Christianity down our throats. Having heard his bullshit before on &#8220;The Reason Driven Podcast&#8221; and &#8220;The Bible Geek&#8221; I deleted your latest episode from my iTunes directory. I don&#8217;t need to hear his crap again.</p>
<p>The very notion of a &#8220;Secular Christian&#8221; (or &#8220;Secular Jew,&#8221; or &#8220;Secular Muslim,&#8221; etc.) should be spurned as the oxymoron that it is. I have no respect for the cowards who think that we must ape the very institutions that repress them just so they can can feel like they belong with the rest of the sheeple. We atheists don&#8217;t need conformist, fascist bullshit like &#8220;community,&#8221; &#8220;family,&#8221; or &#8220;people.&#8221; We don&#8217;t need sentimentalist garbage like &#8220;ritual&#8221; or &#8220;tradition&#8221; to coddle the planet&#8217;s dullards. What we need is embrace the truth.</p>
<p>That truth is this: There are no deities. There is no afterlife or cosmic justice to be doled out to the &#8220;just&#8221; and &#8220;unjust.&#8221; Reality operates on materialistic, scientifically-demonstrable processes, not the primitive superstition of the &#8220;supernatural.&#8221;  &#8220;Good&#8221; and &#8220;evil&#8221; are merely biologically and socially created myths to keep the cowed human herds from destroying themselves. Our lives, the universe, and everything ultimately has no purpose or meaning. </p>
<p>To those who can&#8217;t handle these facts without sugar coating them in ceremonies and songs, I have this to say: TOUGH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 71: Raiding the Mail Bag with Dustin Williams by LuminousMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/04/625/comment-page-1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>LuminousMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=625#comment-118</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day,

Just a correction, Australia does have a separation of church and state:

“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.”

- Section 116, Australian Constitution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day,</p>
<p>Just a correction, Australia does have a separation of church and state:</p>
<p>“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.”</p>
<p>- Section 116, Australian Constitution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 68: Letters to Christian Leaders with Jake Farr-Wharton by Lamar</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/03/592/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 05:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=592#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Wow! That&#039;s pretty embarrassing. I just uploaded the file, so it should be available now. Thanks for letting us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That&#8217;s pretty embarrassing. I just uploaded the file, so it should be available now. Thanks for letting us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 68: Letters to Christian Leaders with Jake Farr-Wharton by KevinTernes</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/03/592/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinTernes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=592#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Hey Guys,
I subscribe to the OGG feed.
For this episode there is something missing.
My podcatcher software says:
  http://chariotsofiron.com/podcast/chariots_68.ogg 404 NOT FOUND</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Guys,<br />
I subscribe to the OGG feed.<br />
For this episode there is something missing.<br />
My podcatcher software says:<br />
  <a href="http://chariotsofiron.com/podcast/chariots_68.ogg" rel="nofollow">http://chariotsofiron.com/podcast/chariots_68.ogg</a> 404 NOT FOUND</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 70: Our First Contest with Roger Nygard by wcanyon</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/03/618/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>wcanyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=618#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I think Roger really really needs to read Sex at Dawn. There were some things that he said that are completely contradicted by the authors of that book. They&#039;ve done quite a bit of research into what humans were like in terms of marriage or whatnot before agriculture came along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Roger really really needs to read Sex at Dawn. There were some things that he said that are completely contradicted by the authors of that book. They&#8217;ve done quite a bit of research into what humans were like in terms of marriage or whatnot before agriculture came along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rick Perry Story an example of Poe&#8217;s Law. by 3dbloke</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/02/587/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>3dbloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=587#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Another great show. Re the unpolished, unscripted nature of Chariots of Iron... I like it.

I do listen to other atheist / humanist podcasts... three regular ones at the moment, but always on the lookout for others.

I&#039;ve listened to a few Chariots of Iron &#039;casts and so far so good :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great show. Re the unpolished, unscripted nature of Chariots of Iron&#8230; I like it.</p>
<p>I do listen to other atheist / humanist podcasts&#8230; three regular ones at the moment, but always on the lookout for others.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve listened to a few Chariots of Iron &#8216;casts and so far so good :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 66: Seventh Day Atheists with Dustin Williams by 3dbloke</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/02/583/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>3dbloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=583#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I discovered the Chariots of Iron podcast just recently. Catching up on previous episodes. Great stuff. I listened to this podcast while doing the washing up this evening. Better than sitting in front of the TV, anyday.

I&#039;m a Brit and live in UK, and it&#039;s interesting to hear all the news from USA and your responses to these. Good, intelligent comment (mostly, ha ha). UK has less of the fanatical Christian types than the States, but we also have to deal with the Europe Union and his Popeness.

Looking forward to listening to more of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered the Chariots of Iron podcast just recently. Catching up on previous episodes. Great stuff. I listened to this podcast while doing the washing up this evening. Better than sitting in front of the TV, anyday.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Brit and live in UK, and it&#8217;s interesting to hear all the news from USA and your responses to these. Good, intelligent comment (mostly, ha ha). UK has less of the fanatical Christian types than the States, but we also have to deal with the Europe Union and his Popeness.</p>
<p>Looking forward to listening to more of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 66: Seventh Day Atheists with Dustin Williams by dwnomad</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/02/583/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>dwnomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=583#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of ornis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of ornis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 66: Seventh Day Atheists with Dustin Williams by Diaphanus</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2011/02/583/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Diaphanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 12:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=583#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Dustin: &quot;In Greek, it&#039;s the same word for the two [bird and omen].&quot;

You mean ὄρνις [ornis]?

The main meaning of that word is &quot;bird,&quot; but its metaphorical meaning is &quot;omen.&quot;

On the other hand there is οἰωνός [oionos].

It refers to a large bird, but its metaphorical meaning is also &quot;omen.&quot;

Which word did you have in mind?  I am just curious.

- Ian Andreas Miller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dustin: &#8220;In Greek, it&#8217;s the same word for the two [bird and omen].&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean ὄρνις [ornis]?</p>
<p>The main meaning of that word is &#8220;bird,&#8221; but its metaphorical meaning is &#8220;omen.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand there is οἰωνός [oionos].</p>
<p>It refers to a large bird, but its metaphorical meaning is also &#8220;omen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which word did you have in mind?  I am just curious.</p>
<p>- Ian Andreas Miller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 51: Pondering Existence With Roger Nygard by Episode 63: The Nature Of Existence Revisited With Roger Nygard &#124; Chariots of Iron</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/06/541/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Episode 63: The Nature Of Existence Revisited With Roger Nygard &#124; Chariots of Iron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=541#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] all may remember our friend, Roger Nygard, from Episode 51: Pondering Existence. Well, he&#8217;s back again to discuss his documentary, The Nature of Existence and gives us the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all may remember our friend, Roger Nygard, from Episode 51: Pondering Existence. Well, he&#8217;s back again to discuss his documentary, The Nature of Existence and gives us the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 29: Socratic Counter-evangelism by The atheist dilemma:To be a dick or not to be a dick. &#171; The Godless Paladin</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/05/442/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>The atheist dilemma:To be a dick or not to be a dick. &#171; The Godless Paladin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=442#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] Chariots of Iron podcast has also talked about this a bit. In episode 29, titled &#8220;Counter-evangelism&#8221; (starts around 1:11:00) they suggest the following approach: Don&#8217;t be a dick, avoid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chariots of Iron podcast has also talked about this a bit. In episode 29, titled &#8220;Counter-evangelism&#8221; (starts around 1:11:00) they suggest the following approach: Don&#8217;t be a dick, avoid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 57: Inside The AAI With Stuart Bechman by Archaneus</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/08/561/comment-page-1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Archaneus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=561#comment-102</guid>
		<description>As per the crazy lies about birth control, what would be so horrible about artificial wombs?  I know this isn&#039;t going to happen anytime soon, but let&#039;s just entertain the idea hypothetically.  Artificial wombs would be great.  No more harm to the mother from complications.  When a woman has a child it saps as much as two years from her life expectancy because of the nutritional havoc imposed by the fetus.  Well, that&#039;s fixed.  Really their opposition to this concept is misogynistic and despicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As per the crazy lies about birth control, what would be so horrible about artificial wombs?  I know this isn&#8217;t going to happen anytime soon, but let&#8217;s just entertain the idea hypothetically.  Artificial wombs would be great.  No more harm to the mother from complications.  When a woman has a child it saps as much as two years from her life expectancy because of the nutritional havoc imposed by the fetus.  Well, that&#8217;s fixed.  Really their opposition to this concept is misogynistic and despicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 53: Recovering from Religion with Darrel Ray by Atheist Empathy &#124; Bitch Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/06/548/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Atheist Empathy &#124; Bitch Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=548#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] one of the most recent Chariots of Iron podcasts, they talked once again about atheist community and how atheists need to have more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one of the most recent Chariots of Iron podcasts, they talked once again about atheist community and how atheists need to have more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 53: Recovering from Religion with Darrel Ray by grrrl meets world &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What he said: on &#8220;emotional intelligence&#8221; and leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/06/548/comment-page-1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>grrrl meets world &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What he said: on &#8220;emotional intelligence&#8221; and leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=548#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] I listened to the latest Chariots of Iron podcast, and there was an interview with author Darrel Ray (author of The God Virus).   Dr. Ray has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I listened to the latest Chariots of Iron podcast, and there was an interview with author Darrel Ray (author of The God Virus).   Dr. Ray has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 31: Inoculating Against the God Virus by Season 2, Episode 3: Recovering from Religion with Darrel Ray &#124; Chariots of Iron</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/06/454/comment-page-1#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Season 2, Episode 3: Recovering from Religion with Darrel Ray &#124; Chariots of Iron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=454#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] Darrel Ray makes his second appearance on Chariots of Iron, almost a full year after our &#8220;Inoculating Against the God Virus&#8221; episode. This time around, Darrel discusses his work doing leadership conferences, his Recovering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Darrel Ray makes his second appearance on Chariots of Iron, almost a full year after our &#8220;Inoculating Against the God Virus&#8221; episode. This time around, Darrel discusses his work doing leadership conferences, his Recovering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 52: Uncovering The Jesus Myth, Part 1, With Frank Zindler by mxyzptlk</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/06/545/comment-page-1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>mxyzptlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=545#comment-87</guid>
		<description>First Tom Merritt leaves Buzz Out Loud (amicably), now Joe leaves Chariots of Iron (amicably). And in both cases, it means double the content -- bittersweet to say the least.

I love the Claim of the Day idea, have a pseudoscience claim to ask about, and a question. First the question: Where&#039;s the best place to post questions/responses to episodes -- here, the Atheist Nexus page, or the Atheiskeptihumanist forums? (I might put this same question in one of those places if I don&#039;t get a response here.)

Now for the pseudoscience question: &quot;EMF stands for electromagnetic field. The theory is that ghosts affect the electromagnetic field, and yadda yadda yadda.&quot; This gets repeated so much on paranormal shows that it&#039;s taken for granted. Switch your dial over to the skeptical podcast channel, and if this idea comes up, it&#039;s immediately guffawed away as ridiculous.

I recently taught a course on logic, argument and conspiracy theories, and the material tilted into this direction, and I just didn&#039;t want to deal with the ghost in the gaps arguments -- we already had enough tin-foil-hat material with the Illuminati and ancient alien astronauts, Glenn Beck and chupacabras. But I&#039;m a bit disappointed that for all the times I&#039;ve heard skeptics take on paranormal claims, I have yet to hear a good explanation for WHY an EMF detector just can&#039;t work in the way they&#039;re claimed to work. 

I understand that if you start from the position that ghosts don&#039;t exist, then ghosts can&#039;t be affecting any fields, electromagnetic or wheat or otherwise. I also understand the risk of the ghost-in-the-gaps counter-argument that it&#039;s simply beyond current science. Let&#039;s call that a wash; what I want to know is why such detectors couldn&#039;t possibly be picking up what ghost chasers claim to be picking up, and tangentially if we then just write off instances where meters seem to spike in response to direct questions as hoaxes. (I have searched for this a bit, but didn&#039;t find much more beyond wave-of-the-hand dismissals and a few claims that they&#039;re simply picking up on normal everyday fluctuations.)

A second claim that might be kind of interesting to deal with has to do with the Science Channel&#039;s new series with Morgan Freeman -- Through the Wormhole, I think it&#039;s called. The first episode tried to tackle the question of a creator. I was a bit put off by the build-up to the episode that suggested if we can&#039;t find what came before the big bang, it just may be god -- more spooks-in-the-gaps arguments. But the episode itself was fairly even-handed in presenting non-theist and theist perspectives. It even took on the claims that we were created, but not by any god, rather as part of a software program that we&#039;re all living within. The scientist who discussed this (I can&#039;t find his name) went so far as to suggest that the beings who wrote the program may be us from the future.

Anyway, the title of the first episode was &quot;Is There A Creator?&quot;, and it might be interesting to view and take on some of those claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Tom Merritt leaves Buzz Out Loud (amicably), now Joe leaves Chariots of Iron (amicably). And in both cases, it means double the content &#8212; bittersweet to say the least.</p>
<p>I love the Claim of the Day idea, have a pseudoscience claim to ask about, and a question. First the question: Where&#8217;s the best place to post questions/responses to episodes &#8212; here, the Atheist Nexus page, or the Atheiskeptihumanist forums? (I might put this same question in one of those places if I don&#8217;t get a response here.)</p>
<p>Now for the pseudoscience question: &#8220;EMF stands for electromagnetic field. The theory is that ghosts affect the electromagnetic field, and yadda yadda yadda.&#8221; This gets repeated so much on paranormal shows that it&#8217;s taken for granted. Switch your dial over to the skeptical podcast channel, and if this idea comes up, it&#8217;s immediately guffawed away as ridiculous.</p>
<p>I recently taught a course on logic, argument and conspiracy theories, and the material tilted into this direction, and I just didn&#8217;t want to deal with the ghost in the gaps arguments &#8212; we already had enough tin-foil-hat material with the Illuminati and ancient alien astronauts, Glenn Beck and chupacabras. But I&#8217;m a bit disappointed that for all the times I&#8217;ve heard skeptics take on paranormal claims, I have yet to hear a good explanation for WHY an EMF detector just can&#8217;t work in the way they&#8217;re claimed to work. </p>
<p>I understand that if you start from the position that ghosts don&#8217;t exist, then ghosts can&#8217;t be affecting any fields, electromagnetic or wheat or otherwise. I also understand the risk of the ghost-in-the-gaps counter-argument that it&#8217;s simply beyond current science. Let&#8217;s call that a wash; what I want to know is why such detectors couldn&#8217;t possibly be picking up what ghost chasers claim to be picking up, and tangentially if we then just write off instances where meters seem to spike in response to direct questions as hoaxes. (I have searched for this a bit, but didn&#8217;t find much more beyond wave-of-the-hand dismissals and a few claims that they&#8217;re simply picking up on normal everyday fluctuations.)</p>
<p>A second claim that might be kind of interesting to deal with has to do with the Science Channel&#8217;s new series with Morgan Freeman &#8212; Through the Wormhole, I think it&#8217;s called. The first episode tried to tackle the question of a creator. I was a bit put off by the build-up to the episode that suggested if we can&#8217;t find what came before the big bang, it just may be god &#8212; more spooks-in-the-gaps arguments. But the episode itself was fairly even-handed in presenting non-theist and theist perspectives. It even took on the claims that we were created, but not by any god, rather as part of a software program that we&#8217;re all living within. The scientist who discussed this (I can&#8217;t find his name) went so far as to suggest that the beings who wrote the program may be us from the future.</p>
<p>Anyway, the title of the first episode was &#8220;Is There A Creator?&#8221;, and it might be interesting to view and take on some of those claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 50: Teabagging Hutaree: How Political Posturing Is Fomenting Sectarian Militantism by mxyzptlk</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/05/539/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>mxyzptlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 05:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=539#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hey, it was great to hear you all back at it again. Here&#039;s some more crazy sticks for the wacky fire. 

I&#039;m here in Virginia where they recently held a gun-owners rally in a national park north of where I&#039;m at -- it was the closest they could legally get to Washington, D.C. with a loaded weapon. They brought semi-automatics, hand guns, rifles, shotguns, etc., the works, a gun show fire sale parking lot. They did it as a warning to the president to be wary of taking their guns. The irony is it was illegal for people to bring guns into a national park like they were doing until the Obama administration passed legislation making it legal. So if it wasn&#039;t for the administration they were threatening from that park with those guns, they wouldn&#039;t be able to go to that park and threaten the president with those guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it was great to hear you all back at it again. Here&#8217;s some more crazy sticks for the wacky fire. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m here in Virginia where they recently held a gun-owners rally in a national park north of where I&#8217;m at &#8212; it was the closest they could legally get to Washington, D.C. with a loaded weapon. They brought semi-automatics, hand guns, rifles, shotguns, etc., the works, a gun show fire sale parking lot. They did it as a warning to the president to be wary of taking their guns. The irony is it was illegal for people to bring guns into a national park like they were doing until the Obama administration passed legislation making it legal. So if it wasn&#8217;t for the administration they were threatening from that park with those guns, they wouldn&#8217;t be able to go to that park and threaten the president with those guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 49: Building Atheist Communities The CFI Way by Post-theism is wishful thinking if you can't leave religion behind &#124; Bitch Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/04/535/comment-page-1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Post-theism is wishful thinking if you can't leave religion behind &#124; Bitch Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=535#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] again, I&#8217;m going to comment on the most recent Chariots of Iron podcast where they had Kurt from CFI Porland on to talk about atheist social groups.  They&#8217;ve been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] again, I&#8217;m going to comment on the most recent Chariots of Iron podcast where they had Kurt from CFI Porland on to talk about atheist social groups.  They&#8217;ve been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 45: Blown for Good, the life and times of the Notorious BFG by The Jamhole &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ep 320: Tang!</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/02/521/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jamhole &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ep 320: Tang!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=521#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] of Iron and the Atheist News podcasts. Good stuff, thanks to Jason for turning me on to them. Here is the ep I was talking about where they interviewed an ex Scientology member. It&#8217;s pretty fucking mind [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Iron and the Atheist News podcasts. Good stuff, thanks to Jason for turning me on to them. Here is the ep I was talking about where they interviewed an ex Scientology member. It&#8217;s pretty fucking mind [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 46: The Prophecy Episode Which Was Fortold In Our Last Prophecy Episode by Chariots of Iron: A Response &#124; Bitch Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/03/526/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Chariots of Iron: A Response &#124; Bitch Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=526#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] was pleasantly surprised to hear the blog mentioned and discussed on the most recent Chariots of Iron podcast.  Thanks guys, I love your podcast, keep the good stuff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was pleasantly surprised to hear the blog mentioned and discussed on the most recent Chariots of Iron podcast.  Thanks guys, I love your podcast, keep the good stuff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 45: Blown for Good, the life and times of the Notorious BFG by I Hate "Belief" in Evolution &#124; Bitch Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2010/02/521/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>I Hate "Belief" in Evolution &#124; Bitch Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=521#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] who try desperately to be religious without religion.  This was pointed out to me on the latest Chariots of Iron podcast that my wife and I listened to over the weekend, where they kept talking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who try desperately to be religious without religion.  This was pointed out to me on the latest Chariots of Iron podcast that my wife and I listened to over the weekend, where they kept talking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 41: The First Noelle — Secular Center Charity by Where do I fit in? &#124; Bitch Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/11/507/comment-page-1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Where do I fit in? &#124; Bitch Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=507#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] were talking on the most recent Chariots of Iron podcast about the various kinds of atheists and how they fit into the 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 models.  They talked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were talking on the most recent Chariots of Iron podcast about the various kinds of atheists and how they fit into the 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 models.  They talked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 36: The FIRST ANNIVERSARY EPISODE, with Professor PZ Myers! by Happy Anniversary Chariots of Iron!</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/09/477/comment-page-1#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy Anniversary Chariots of Iron!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=477#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] Download the show here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Download the show here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 36: The FIRST ANNIVERSARY EPISODE, with Professor PZ Myers! by Atheist Quote of the Day &#171; Atheist in Hiding</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/09/477/comment-page-1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Atheist Quote of the Day &#171; Atheist in Hiding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=477#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] on to the Chariots of Iron podcast, a weekly discussion of news of relevance to atheists. The most recent episode has as a guest renowned biology professor and atheist blogger PZ Myers, who had this to say about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on to the Chariots of Iron podcast, a weekly discussion of news of relevance to atheists. The most recent episode has as a guest renowned biology professor and atheist blogger PZ Myers, who had this to say about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 36: The FIRST ANNIVERSARY EPISODE, with Professor PZ Myers! by Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/09/477/comment-page-1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=477#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Alex,

Thanks for taking the time to tell your story here, interesting to hear about the legal wrangling that has to go on just to protect from the intrusion of religious dogma into our legal system. I would personally like to thank you for aiding this case, I find it somewhat disturbing that when you have such a blatant violation that one would still have to &quot;show harm&quot;, &quot;it&#039;s unconstitutional&quot; should be enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to tell your story here, interesting to hear about the legal wrangling that has to go on just to protect from the intrusion of religious dogma into our legal system. I would personally like to thank you for aiding this case, I find it somewhat disturbing that when you have such a blatant violation that one would still have to &#8220;show harm&#8221;, &#8220;it&#8217;s unconstitutional&#8221; should be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Season 2, Episode 36: The FIRST ANNIVERSARY EPISODE, with Professor PZ Myers! by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/09/477/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=477#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually one of the named plaintiffs who brought suit against the Kentucky legislation that shoved god into our department of Homeland Security.  I wanted to clarify a couple of the points you brought up in your discussion about it.  First of all, the reason it took three years to bring the suit was because nobody noticed that wording was in there for about three years.  It was only after one of the local papers published an article on it, that we even knew that the wording was there.  Riner kind of snuck it into the bill and the legislators in Kentucky never want to be seen to be anything but good Christians so Riner&#039;s additions had very little opposition.  Once we found out about it Edwin Kagin immediately started looking for people who were willing to sign on as plaintiffs.  What was interesting and kind of crazy to me was that in order to successfully bring the lawsuit we actually had to show mental and/or physical harm from the law.  Apparently, it could have been immediately thrown out if we had simply said it was unconstitutional without showing harm.  So you had questioned whether a lawsuit actually had to be brought or whether someone could have said this is clearly unconstitutional and stopped it, but not only was it necessary to bring the lawsuit (after all this was part of an actual law passed by the Kentucky legislature) but it was also necessary to show actual harm.  Because of this some of the claims of the plaintiffs do end up sounding kind of silly.  Things like the law causing headaches, insomnia, and the like were particularly emphasized in the lawsuit just so we could meet the requirement that the law caused harm.  I don&#039;t think any of us were lying, but I was certainly emphasizing ill effects more than I would have otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually one of the named plaintiffs who brought suit against the Kentucky legislation that shoved god into our department of Homeland Security.  I wanted to clarify a couple of the points you brought up in your discussion about it.  First of all, the reason it took three years to bring the suit was because nobody noticed that wording was in there for about three years.  It was only after one of the local papers published an article on it, that we even knew that the wording was there.  Riner kind of snuck it into the bill and the legislators in Kentucky never want to be seen to be anything but good Christians so Riner&#8217;s additions had very little opposition.  Once we found out about it Edwin Kagin immediately started looking for people who were willing to sign on as plaintiffs.  What was interesting and kind of crazy to me was that in order to successfully bring the lawsuit we actually had to show mental and/or physical harm from the law.  Apparently, it could have been immediately thrown out if we had simply said it was unconstitutional without showing harm.  So you had questioned whether a lawsuit actually had to be brought or whether someone could have said this is clearly unconstitutional and stopped it, but not only was it necessary to bring the lawsuit (after all this was part of an actual law passed by the Kentucky legislature) but it was also necessary to show actual harm.  Because of this some of the claims of the plaintiffs do end up sounding kind of silly.  Things like the law causing headaches, insomnia, and the like were particularly emphasized in the lawsuit just so we could meet the requirement that the law caused harm.  I don&#8217;t think any of us were lying, but I was certainly emphasizing ill effects more than I would have otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 29: Socratic Counter-evangelism by LouisDavout</title>
		<link>http://www.chariotsofiron.com/2009/05/442/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>LouisDavout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chariotsofiron.com/?p=442#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Have any of you read Dialogue with a Christian Proselytizer by Todd Allen Gates? Two thirds of the book is a fictional conversation between a Christian and a skeptic sort of along the lines you guys guys were discussing. There were a few points that I wish the skeptic character would have pushed the conversation a little further. But otherwise, I thought it was a good book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any of you read Dialogue with a Christian Proselytizer by Todd Allen Gates? Two thirds of the book is a fictional conversation between a Christian and a skeptic sort of along the lines you guys guys were discussing. There were a few points that I wish the skeptic character would have pushed the conversation a little further. But otherwise, I thought it was a good book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

